Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i'm currently reviewing a doc on suse linux enterprise 11, the > section on NFS, but i don't have a SLES 11 machine in front of me. > could anyone who uses both SLES 11 and fedora 12 comment on how > indistinguishable the NFS setups are across those two distros? > > so far, i haven't seen a lot that's massively incompatible, and i > wouldn't expect to. obviously, the fundamental files are going to be > the same. > I haven't use suse in quite some time. Are you asking about SLES (which is the equivalent of RHEL) or openSUSE which is more akin to Fedora, AFAIK? In any event, if I were doing what I think you're doing I would download either the openSUSE DVD or the openSUSE live CD's and try it myself in a Virtual Machine. I mean, who better to know what exact comparisons I'm looking for? As I said, I've not used suse in quite a while. But, your question as well as the post about firefox/kde integration has prompted me to start downloading the DVD to give it a try. I think it is safe to say that Fedora/RH place less emphasis on KDE than suse does. So, being a KDE leaning person it would be worth the time to check it out. Of course, just like trying any other distro there will be differences. I believe suse uses yast as their package manger. But, at least it is rpm based and I'm used to the warts of that system. Should I get the chance to experiment with NFSv4 on it I will. Probably try to export and mount file systems from/to a F12 system. Sounds like a nice challenge.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
