On 12/31/2009 07:46 AM, Randy Yates wrote: > Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> [...] >> To claim that you got banned "for asking fedora questions" sounds >> unrealistic. It's a biased view, I think. > > So you're making a judgement call on missing information? > >> Perhaps what you considered appropriate for that channel was deemed >> inappropriate because of the way you presented it to the people? > > Perhaps. And perhaps what I am stating is true and unbiased. For > example, if I don't understand something, I expect to be able to say, "I > don't understand." Your quoting leaves something to be desired. By cutting the paragraph before the first one you quoted, you change a request for more information to look like it is a judgment call. Though I guess your not including this information does lead to a judgment of you. If this is an indication of how you post on the IRC channel, I can see why you run into problems. (Missing part of the quote): One important thing that is missing in your post is an example of what had happened in the channel prior to one of those three banning you. Mikkel -- Registered Linux User #16148 (http://counter.li.org/)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
