2009/12/21 Alan Evans <ame.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>: > So I thought to file a RFE about it except: > > What component would it be against? Its location in the menu suggests > that it's some sort of Nautilus extension, but I can't figure what > package its in. It's in file-roller: [sam@samlap Desktop]$ rpm -qif /usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-2.0/libnautilus-fileroller.so Name : file-roller Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.28.1 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 2.fc12 Build Date: Fri 30 Oct 2009 03:38:18 GMT Install Date: Sat 31 Oct 2009 13:14:05 GMT Build Host: x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com Group : Applications/Archiving Source RPM: file-roller-2.28.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Size : 4827862 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) Packager : Fedora Project URL : http://download.gnome.org/sources/file-roller/ Summary : Tool for viewing and creating archives Description : File Roller is an application for creating and viewing archives files, such as tar or zip files. > Am I the only person in the world that cares? I mean, would it just be > a waste of time for my to file a RFE that's inevitably going to be > ignored or closed NOTABUG? I didn't actually notice until you pointed it out and while I don't actually care either way, your reasoning makes sense - which is a valid argument for an RFE. -- Sam -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
