On 12/20/2009 10:44 AM, Hiisi wrote: > 2009/12/20 Steven Stern <subscribed-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 12/19/2009 10:29 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> Steven Stern wrote: >>>> On 12/13/2009 07:25 AM, Globe Trotter wrote: >>> > <--SNIP--> >>>> >>> Note that in the above example of a stable system, item 3. I have had >>> about equal numbers of people tell me that the vendor driver is vastly >>> more stable than the built-in driver, and totally the opposite. >>> >>> Oh, and some fundamentalist open source fanatics who tell me it's better >>> to crash a few times a day than use a closed source driver. ;-) >>> >>> The only "desktop effect" of interest to me is stability. >>> >> >> Agreed on your final point. Just for grins, I'm downloading and will >> try the Radeon X300 drivers directly from ATI with Compiz enabled. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Steve > > 'Directly from ATI' you will have to compile them manually. I think > it's better use rpm [1]. > Just my 2 cents... > > Links: > 1. http://rpmfusion.org/RPMFusionSwitcher I found that out. The ATI drivers don't like the current kernel. I'm using rpmfusion (for the codecs), but I don't see any ATI drivers there. -- Steve -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
