Ryan Lynch wrote: >>> Actually, the complexity is that Fedora for some insane reason still >> defaults to using LVM for everything *other* than /boot. This brings >> no benefit to most users. > > With all due respect, the fact that one of us can't imagine the need > for some technology doesn't say much, one way or another, about > whether a general use case exists. In general, I find this attitude > amusing, but you may have a point W.R.T. LVM. As far as I can see, the poster was not objecting to LVM per se; he was simply asserting that it should not be the default, which I agree with. I was an LVM fan for some time, but ran into an insoluble problem a couple of years ago, where some kind of corruption preventing me accessing my LVM partitions. I came to the conclusion that the disadvantages of LVM far outweighed the advantages. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines