Re: F12 EEEPC 1000H WLAN with hidden SSID no go

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim wrote:
Tim (re hidden SSIDs):
It doesn't add *ANY* security.
It *does* add problems.

It doesn't hide your access point, at all.  It still appears as an
access point that can be used.  Anybody, and everybody, can see that
there's one there.  It just doesn't have a name associated with it.

And the lack of a name doesn't prevent anyone from using it.

Bill Davidsen:
FUD. How can you hold two diametrically opposed ideas in your brain without your head exploding?

You idiot.  You don't understand what you're reading, and the one
spouting the FUD is you - that hiding an SSID has anything, at all, even
to the slightest degree, to do with security.  Get a fucking clue.

Look at your first two lines and reconcile "adds no security" with "harder to use."

The two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.

Security is about *preventing* unauthorised use, the SSID has absolutely
nothing to do with security.  And *no* amount of futzing around with it
will ever "secure" a network.

The only way to absolutely prevent unauthorized use is to turn off the machine. That's why there are security updates regularly, *all* measures are about making it harder, forcing the evildoer to find and use the more difficult exploit.

Being "harder to use" without it is about breaking normal network
functionality.  Those people that are authorised to use the system, now,
have a more difficult time connecting to the right access point, or
avoiding connecting to the wrong one.

When will idiots get it through their dense heads that making something
more difficult to use, normally/properly, has absolutely nothing to do
with making something more secure.  And that publicly repeating
that /hide the SSID/ crap actually causes harm.  Because of it, we have
people foolishly breaking their networking, and thinking that they're
securing it.

Do not hide the SSID, it is a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME.

Actually, I gave him a way to do what he asked, it's his machine, not mine. I only advise (in lower case, even) because it's not my week to be God. Checking the roster, it's not yours, either.

Have a nice holiday.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux