On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Reg Clemens <reg@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Reg Clemens <reg@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I have just brought up 64bit fc11, done a 'yum update' to bring it up to >> > date with the current changes, and am trying to build the 2.7.31.6 kernel. >> > >> > This is my first try at a 64bit OS, so I may be doing something stupid. >> > >> > I see a number of compile errors/warnings, but the most significant seem >> > to be near the end of the build of the modules, where I see: >> > >> > --- >> > > << snip >> >> >> You've installed the 64-bit version of Fedora 11. So naturally the >> glibc that was installed is also 64-bit. >> >> Are you trying to compile a 32-bit kernel? Then you need to install >> the 32-bit version of glibc. > > Nope, trying to build a 64bit kernel. >> >> Can you do a "rpm -qa | grep glibc" and paste the output here? >> > Here is that result: > > [reg@deneb ~]$ rpm -qa | grep glibc > glibc-headers-2.10.1-5.x86_64 > glibc-common-2.10.1-5.x86_64 > glibc-2.10.1-5.x86_64 > >> When you install 32-bit glibc, the file ld-linux.so.2 will be >> installed. Presently it is not. >> >> Can you do a search for ld-linux.so.2 by using the following command? >> >> # find / -name ld-linux.so.2 >> > > [root@deneb reg]# !! > find / -name ld-linux.so.2 -print > [root@deneb reg]# > > Nope, not found, looking at my fc10 (32bit) this is a symbolic link pointing > to ld-2.10.so in the same directory. Looking at /lib, thats not there either. > > In a 2nd email, you asked for > >> Can you also do a "head -n 15 .config"? > > Here is that listing. > > [root@deneb linux-2.6.31.6-PPS]# head -n 15 .config > # > # Automatically generated make config: don't edit > # Linux kernel version: 2.6.31.6-PPS > # Sun Nov 15 18:49:16 2009 > # > CONFIG_64BIT=y > # CONFIG_X86_32 is not set > CONFIG_X86_64=y > CONFIG_X86=y > CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT="elf64-x86-64" > CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig" > CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y > CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE=y > CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG=y > CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y > > --- > > So, to me it looks like (at least) one rpm did not load, yet the rpm -qa shows them > as having loaded. > > I just went back and did a > sha256sum Fedora-11-X86_64-DVD.iso > and it gave the correct checksum, > however when I did > sha256sum /dev/cdrom > to check the DVD, it did NOT give the correct checksum. > Perhaps I should reburn the DVD ? Or is this not the correct way to check the DVD ? > > In any case, any thoughts on my problem will be appreciated. > > -- > Reg.Clemens > reg@xxxxxxx > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines > You should install glibc-devel. -- Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering) Alma Maters: (1) Singapore Polytechnic (2) National University of Singapore My Primary Blog: http://teo-en-ming-aka-zhang-enming.blogspot.com My Secondary Blog: http://enmingteo.wordpress.com My Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/enmingteo Email: space.time.universe@xxxxxxxxx Mobile Phone (Starhub Prepaid): +65-8369-2618 Street: Bedok Reservoir Road Country: Singapore -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
