On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:03:59 -0500, Kevin wrote: > On 11/12/2009 10:32 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: > > On 11/11/2009 07:51 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:25:45PM -0800, Brian Mury wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 12:23 -0800, Brian Mury wrote: > >>> > >>>> ipstate > >>>> > >>> Replace all occurrences of "ipstate" in my post with "iptstate". Oops! > >>> > >> Known problem -- the maintainer made a minor mistake and this should > >> be cleared up shortly. Just wait until tomorrow and try again. > >> Fedora contributors are working on tools that in the future will help > >> minimize these occurrences. If anyone would like to get involved to > >> solve the problem, they're always welcome! > >> > > > > Um, really? One down and one more to go! > > > > Still a problem:: > > =========== > > nufw-2.2.21-3.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems > > --> Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1 is needed by > > package nufw-2.2.21-3.fc11.i586 (installed) > > Error: Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1 is needed by > > package nufw-2.2.21-3.fc11.i586 (installed) > > Wait for your mirror to sync up. I was successful late last night > re-installing iptstate (I removed it temporarily before they said to wait). You don't understand. Take a close look at above quote. There are other packages than iptstate affected. The maintainer seems to have ignored the broken deps report. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
