Robert P. J. Day wrote: > what's the reasoning for that? is it because that package has no > value in a 64-bit environment? The specfile¹ says: # Upstream makes *heavy* use of inline x86 asm this would take extensive # work to support anything other than x86. See the URL for more info. # http://psyco.sourceforge.net/links.html # # """ # Here are a couple of non-Pythonic dynamic compilation projects. I am # often pointed to them as potentials back-ends for Psyco, to help make # Psyco portable beyond the current x86 machine code. However, I consider # them as not really suited for Psyco. # """ ¹ http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/python-psyco/devel/python-psyco.spec?view=markup -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A good scapegoat is almost as good as a solution.
Attachment:
pgp2BkRX5uw09.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
