On 11/4/2009 6:14 AM, Tim wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 03:58 +1100, Roger wrote: >> Were I in your position I would opt for 32 bit install the software >> and just 'use' the computer. In truth you probably will install 64 >> bit and all the discussion is merely opinions. > > My laptop supposedly supports 64 bit computing, but I installed 32 bit > software, seeing as (at the time) people were stating all sorts of > issues with using 64 bits for some of the things that I was already > doing on 32 bits, without any troubles. For example, getting Flash to > work on websites, or using sound (I seem to recall an issue with some > sound cards, and 64 bits). > > Given some time for experimentation, and a new computer (i.e. one > without anything I needed to keep on it), I'd be tempted to do a 64 bit > install, and see how it worked with the things that I wanted to do. > Then, it'd be an easy case to wipe off and install 32 bit software, if > it was a dismal failure, or just keep on using 64 bit software if I > couldn't see a problem with it. > > Having a fresh computer is an ideal time to try it both ways, and decide > for yourself, based on your own needs and experiences. When I built my first x86_64 box several years ago I immediately installed an x86_64 Fedora OS and software. With the needed x86 software and libraries mixed in as dealt with by the Fedora system. I never 'fought' the system. Whatever 'Fedora' wanted to do I did. I have had none of the problems that some have mentioned. None. Ever. You bought the hardware why not use it? -- David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
