On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 00:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 10/13/2009 07:14 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > Someone recently mentioned gnote as a substitute for tomboy. So I > > installed it. The two programs have essentially identical man pages. If > > you add gnote to your panel you get the same icon as tomboy. Executing > > both of then you get the same display. But looking at the program in > > the /usr/bin directory gnote is much larger. I looked at the script for > > tomboy and gnote is not mentioned. But tomboy appears throughout the > > binary gnote. > > > > So, what is the scoop about these two programs? > > The size of either of these programs are fairly similar. The size for > Gnote installed on my system is 4.1 MB vs 4.8 MB for Tomboy. You should > also note that Tomboy pulls is a considerable amount of the Mono stack. That is not the situation on my mazchine: [akonstam@localhost bin]$ ls -l gnote tomboy -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1904064 2009-07-14 17:45 gnote -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1143 2009-07-01 11:03 tomboy So somethiong is very different on my machine than your machine. Can you explain this? > > Gnote is a port/fork of Tomboy from Mono to C++ > > http://lwn.net/Articles/331187/ > > Look up $yum info gnote tomboy for more details. > > Rahul > -- ======================================================================= "Catch a wave and you're sitting on top of the world." - The Beach Boys ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
