Re: F11 and CD Failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/06/2009 04:46 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:29 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>   
>> Aaron Konstam wrote:
>>     
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> I tried this on F9, it does not seem to work:
>>>>
>>>> # mount -t iso9660 -o ro /dev/sr0 /media/cd
>>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sr0,
>>>>        missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>>>>        In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>>>>        dmesg | tail  or so
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Yoour type was wrong. Are audio CDs for example iso99660?
>>>   
>>>       
>> The man pages says only:  iso9660 is available, so I used this one.
>>
>> In any case, I tried it to see what it does:
>> # mount -t iso99660 -o ro /dev/cdrom /media/cd
>> mount: unknown filesystem type 'iso99660'
>> mount: maybe you meant 'iso9660'?
>>     
> ----
> yes, iso9660 - Aaron is somewhat typo prone, but recognize that an
> 'audio cd' does not have an iso9660 file system...it has no file system
> at all and thus cannot be mounted on any level other than 'virtual' -
> i.e. so the disc can be ripped or played.
> ---- 
>   
>>     
>>>> Interestingly,  removing the CD from the drive results:
>>>> # mount -t iso9660 -o ro /dev/sr0 /media/cd
>>>> mount: No medium found
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Is yoour CD drive /dev/sro or /dev/sr1?
>>>   
>>>       
>> See below...  there are TWO CD/DVD devices!
>>     
>>>> Note: /dev/cdrom does not work.  I tried this for both
>>>> of my CD CD/DVD drives and I note that the devices
>>>> respectively are: /dev/sr0 and /dev/sr1
>>>>
>>>> # mount -t iso9660 -o ro /dev/cdrom /media/cd
>>>> mount: special device /dev/cdrom does not exist
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> You have no /dev/cdrom it looks like.
>>>       
>> Yes, no /dev/cdrom and since I have a CD device and a
>> CD/DVD device, this is what I see:
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2009-10-06 06:49 /dev/cdrom2 -> sr0
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2009-10-06 06:49 /dev/cdrom6 -> sr1
>>
>> Is the reason I have no /dev/cdrom because there is no possible
>> way to determine which device will have /dev/cdrom?
>>     
> ----
> that could have been the issue though you certainly could recreate the
> link if you wanted, but you would have to decide which drive.
>
> i.e.
>
> ln -s /dev/sr0 /dev/cdrom
> or
> ln -s /dev/sr1 /dev/cdrom
>
> but you cannot do both
>
> Craig
>   
Thanks, Craig!
Dan

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux