On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 13:07 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > I'm just not buying Bill's concept of breaking and never digging > out. > > > That's your choice, I think Tait Clarridge hit the method to downgrade > first, > then rerun the upgrade. In another forum (chat room) someone said that > the yum > 'clean' had been used, then upgrade succeeded in fixing the system. > > Both of those suggestions indicate that "using only the 'upgrade' > command" isn't > the way to get things sane again. If it worked for you, fine, but I > still put > Tait's suggestion in my tricks folder, seems a robust thing to do, > rather than > repeating the unsuccessful upgrade. ---- it's about the assumption... if a yum clean metadata fixes the issue, then it is not an issue that is problematic for everyone but only those whose metadata contains a package list of updates that won't work...it's a local problem. I can assure you that neither I nor most have had to 'downgrade' in order to upgrade. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
