Re: Fwd: Re: Understanding Local Networking - Thanks, so far....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 23:16 +0930, Tim wrote:
> If you need file access over Windows and Linux, then Samba is the
> usual
> solution.  If the file access is only between Linux boxes, then NFS is
> the usual solution.  SMB/CIFS (the protocols Samba uses) can be cranky
> on Windows, where name resolution isn't working, and when machines
> join
> the network (they have an election for who gets to be top dog, and it
> seems to be done like a dog fight - bloody with a slow recovery
> period).
----
just for clarification sake since you insinuate that this is madness...

Samba, like any Windows computer on any network will compete to be the
master browser on the LAN but at some point (perhaps it was Fedora 9),
the 'nmb' daemon was separated from the 'smb' daemon (see /etc/init.d/)
so that unless you specifically start the nmb daemon, a Fedora computer
running smb will not be part of the election.

The election occurs about every 15 minutes unless the last election
winner announces that it is shutting down. The election determines which
computer will provide a NETBIOS list of computers on the LAN (NETBIOS
name resolution). 

Fedora users can actually determine which Windows computer is the master
browser by opening up a terminal and typing...
nmblookup -M -- -
(note, include the dashes as above... 2 dashes, a space and then another
dash).

What you are probably referring to as 'slow recovery period' is because
of past experiences showing computers that were shut down or turned on
since the previous election and whether they show up or not in browse
lists. This is standard Microsoft Windows behavior.

This is well documented behavior by both Microsoft and Samba. Default
samba settings would likely cause a Fedora samba server to win the
election against Windows XP and Windows Vista computers but again, only
if you start the 'nmb' service. Default samba settings on Fedora would
not likely cause it to win an election if some Windows server were on
the LAN. But NETBIOS does not provide DNS resolution, only name
resolution for Windows services. So it is generally of little interest
to Linux users unless you do more sophisticated things with say
nsswitch.conf but that is beyond what most people will do with their
boxes.

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux