> I was not counting packages in getdeb or ppa, I simply prefere not use > them, if I don't know the sources... I didn't imply that you counted them. I meant that packages in universe are generally not updated to the latest upstream versions, which in and of itself is fine as long as they're maintained and patched, like in Debian. Then again, not all of them are and in that case you get the worst of both worlds. > I have a standard debian installation with all the official + > debian-multimedia turned on, it should be like having a > fedora+rpmfusion configuration. > I thought you were comparing Fedora repos to Ubuntu repos, not Debian. > About your comment for ubuntu universe packages I wonder what kind of > problems have you had... packages starts and works, they're not > supported. > As I said, in my experience, many of the universe apps that are not very popular crashed on startup, especially biology, chemistry and astronomy software. Some had broken depenencies, others didn't remove cleanly, etc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: To jest =?UTF-8?Q?cz=C4=99=C5=9B=C4=87?= =?UTF-8?Q?_wiadomo=C5=9Bci?= podpisana cyfrowo
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
