Tom Horsley wrote: >>> ... And they use deb-packages - there's no yum. > > They guys who have to actually package up our software at work > consider that an advantage. From the practical complications > involved in packaging, they say deb packages are infinitely easier > to understand and generate than rpms. That's simply opinion, just as I feel that packaging rpms is infinitely easier than packaging debs. I've done a bit of both and I would take a single spec file anyday over the much higher number of files involved in created anything more than a dirt-simple deb package. :) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -- Demotivators (www.despair.com)
Attachment:
pgptO1u5P4fZV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines