Re: MythTV vs php

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/26/2009 11:16 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
>> On 08/26/2009 06:34 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Greetings;
>>>
>>> We have had a showstopper as far as yumex is concerned, for 3 or more
>>> days, while trying to update our MythTV installs on 32 bit F10 installs.
>>>
>>> The MythTV package series now offered needs a dependency called
>>> php-process. Obviously there is no such package available, or wasn't a
>>> couple of hours ago.
>>>
>>> Has anyone an idea how this can be alleviated?
>>>
>>> Thanks all.
>>
>> Where are you getting MythTV from?  ATRPMs or RPMFusion (or from source
>> code)?  I can find the RPM in the F11 Fedora repo, but it is not
>> installed on my FE only laptop (installed from ATRPMs).  And, like you,
>> it isn't found on my F10 systems, and it isn't needed for me on my BE.
>> All of my systems are up-to-date....
> 
> MythTV comes from rpmfusion, and I have a previous version installed but have 
> not managed to get it properly configured.  And I'm all up to date except for 
> that. 

If you're on F10, and you're running an F10 version of MythTV that
depends on php-process, then I would expect that RPMFusion is
responsible for providing it for you.

Are you sure its a MythTV package that depends on it?

Jarod Wilson published the Mythology pages for getting MythTV to work on
Fedora releases since FC3 or so.  I got mine working around FC5
timeframe, and it continues to work on F10 for me.  All packages from
ATRPMs.  (OK, there's that PIL vs python-imaging-libarary problem, but
besides that, it works for me.)  Also, there is now MythDora that you
should look into as it starts out as a Live-CD (or DVD, I forget) that
you can install on your MythTV systems so you should start with a
working system.

What are your problems getting MythTV running, and have you looked for
help on the MythTV-users email list?

If so, bugzilla it over at RPMFusion.

> Kaffiene tries to work, but development seems to have stopped before 
  ^^^^^^^^
  kaffeine?

> it was anywhere near prime time material.  And the fedora version is at least 
> 2 years out of date, I had to build that from the tarballs.
> 


-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjchome@xxxxxxx
cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org)

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux