On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:18 -0600, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: > I don't understand why for this bug priority is considered low and > severity is considered only medium. I would have expected a high > priority and a high severity. After all, this blocks entire > applications. Can any one explain? Thanks! Since *we* aren't those maintaining that package we could only *guess*. But *perhaps*... Low if the problem is considered fixed upstream (no more action needed at this end). Medium severity because things simply don't work, rather than it being a case of gaping security holes. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
