Jack Howarth wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that swig-1.3.39-1.fc10 has dependency > problems? I am seeing... Yes, it was noted in the comments of the package update¹, had a bug filed², and an updated package built which is awaiting the next push³. Why the initial update was pushed directly to the stable updates, I don't know. This is the sort of thing that would be caught in updates-testing (at least until the push process can perform such sanity checks automatically). ¹ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8145 ² https://bugzilla.redhat.com/514983 ³ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swig-1.3.39-3.fc10 -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Despite the high cost of living, it remains a popular item.
Attachment:
pgp83g0Nf6o5j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
