Tim wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 21:21 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: > >> Not minimizing your pain, but I don't understand the problem. The >> language packs are pretty small - all told they come out to about 17MB >> on my system. Even if you don't use them, then that's not a lot of >> disk space or network transfer volume. >> > > If you running on a computer with limited space, such as flash RAMs on > those mini laptops, then the more space you can save, the better. 17 > megs here, 10 megs there, it all adds up. And I have noticed that it's > quicker to start Firefox when they're all disabled. > If it is really true that start up is quicker with them disabled, and I have serious doubts about it, then the code to pick which *single* language pack is seriously broken. I would think the logic is..... If environment is *not* en_US load langpack-XX (if enabled), continue. I can't see the logic being much more extensive than that..... I can't envision any programmer going through the list of enabled language packs and wasting time....unless we are talking about an MS product... :-) > Thankfully, the last few Firefox updates haven't re-enabled all the > languages that I had disabled. I notice a few new ones get added, from > time to time, and they will be enabled by default. > > -- Organic chemistry is the chemistry of carbon compounds. Biochemistry is the study of carbon compounds that crawl. -- Mike Adams Mei-Mei.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=cCSz_koUhSg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
