Re: [Slightly OT] Re: Ranter or evangelist?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 31 July 2009 01:43:39 gilpel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Yes. You have been told many times already. Fedora CANNOT include
> > mplayer due to legal reasons (ie) some of these codecs infringe on US
> > patents and redistribution of codecs for a distribution legally based in
> > US would invite lawsuits.
>
> If you take a look at this page:
>
> http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/codecs/
>
> you will see that some codecs are named "essential". Even though I admit
> knowing very little in the matter, I believe those codecs do not "infringe
> on US patents".

I am afraid they do. Take a look at libavcodec, main part of ffmpeg (which is 
in turn the main part of mplayer):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libavcodec#Implemented_video_codecs

It has implemented various patented codecs, like vmw. Ditto for audio (further 
down the page), mp3 for example.

> Couldn't the other codecs be packaged separately and be
> distributed through rpmfusion?
>
> This way, GMplayer would work with MPlayer as Totem does with gstreamer,
[snip]
> Why is it impossible to include the "ugly" equivalent for MPlayer? This,
> and only this, is what I don't understand.

Not being a mplayer developer, I can only take a wild guess --- mplayer uses 
ffmpeg library whenever possible, and code quality would suffer if ffmpeg would 
be split into several smaller parts. This is essentially design choice --- 
gstreamer is based on a completely different design (not necessarily worse, 
just different) from ffmpeg, and developers usually have their (good) reasons 
for choosing this or that software design. They think it is better this way, 
and they are probably right.

All that said, even if this split into good-bad-ugly is made for mplayer, it 
would be shipped in Fedora as crippled as Totem, and that would serve no 
purpose to anyone. From marketing point of view, I would rather like to have 
it in rpmfusion repository --- either have it fully-functional, or not have it 
at all.

Best, :-)
Marko




-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux