Thanks Michael; On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 03:46 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:48:45 -0400, William wrote: > > > Hi; > > > > I have been going through my messages log and saw this. > > ... > > kernel: tuner 2-0042: chip found @ 0x84 (cx23885[0]) > > kernel: tda829x 2-0042: could not clearly identify tuner address, > > defaulting to 60 > > kernel: tda18271 2-0060: creating new instance > > kernel: TDA18271HD/C1 detected @ 2-0060 > > kernel: tda829x 2-0042: type set to tda8295+18271 > > ... > > > > Is this normal, or does "could not clearly identify tuner address" > > indicate a problem? > > /kernel-2.6.29/linux-2.6.29.i686/drivers/media/common/tuners/tda8290.c > > The implementation in the source code is ambiguous. The warning means that > either no tuner was detected or that multiple were detected (at most four > from 0x60 to 0x63), but the driver didn't pass its check when trying to > choose either one automatically, and then it uses a default address, 0x60. > Nevertheless, in a later check the driver thinks the tuner at the chosen > address works or else it would report an error "tuner access failed". > hmmm ... I am currently going through lshal to find out what HAL thinks video0, video1, hw:0 and hw:1 are. I'll keep this re: tuner in mind. There is some stuff about ALSA in the HAL list as well. -- Regards Bill Fedora 11, Gnome 2.26.3 Evo.2.26.3, Emacs 22.3.1 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
