Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/27/2009 09:26 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 9:30 PM, solarflow99<solarflow99@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Ben Boeckel<MathStuf@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Farkas Levente wrote:

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Alan Cox
<alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
"all of my system has a wrong openssl version"

all these symptoms sound like your upgrade went horribly
wrong. I've seen
preupgrade mash up a box by half upgrading like that. It's
the main reason
I don't think preupgrade is actually safe to use yet.

i use fedora install dvd in this case! if it's do a half
upgrade then  it's
also the bug of the installer.


"i already install f11 yum show 2069 packages to update!!!
just one month
after the release! my system consist of 2059"

In other words your box didn't update to F11 in the first
place, it just
updated a few things and exploded, which is what it tends to
do. You were
basically running FC10 and a few random bits of FC11.

as i wrote i use fedora install dvd! if it's jusr updated a
few things then
it's also the bug of the installer.
This is a problem with the DVD that is hard to solve. Fully
updated F10 is newer than F11 was when the DVD was spun
(especially when the DVD is a month old)...so not everything got
updated. There was a thread on it earlier on this list. It
either breaks other things to fix or the DVD is just broken to
update from after X days of release.
so you're not the only one with F11 problems, I cant even install it, the
bug isn't being looked at either, there nothing I can do.


Wait for a re-spin...

http://fedoraunity.org/re-spins-info/faq/fedora-media-and-the-re-spins

http://www.kanarip.com/2009/07/new-fedora-11-respin-in-testing-plus-anaconda-updates

FC

On this subject, why isn't the standard anaconda package for F11 updated when bugs are found and fixed ? I, amongst others I'm sure, make their own local
re-spins of F11 that we can install on our local systems. One of the
major items needed in a respin is the anaconda installer as if this has bugs
for our systems installing is very difficult. All other packages can be fixed
by a later yum update. If anaconda updated packages were released as part of the normal F11 updates then respins built with pungi would have all of
the latest installation bugs fixed.

Terry

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux