On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram<sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/21/2009 01:36 AM, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> Article: http://oswatershed.org/ >> >> That's much higher than I would have guessed. I suppose Fedora is no >> longer as fast paced as it used to be. Arch seems to be the innovating >> distro now. > > Not shipping the very latest in the "stable" release of Fedora is by no > means equivalent to obsolete. Arch is definitely more bleeding edge > being a rolling distribution however. > > Rahul I've always found that some Fedora policies are far from as bleeding edge as observers would believe. However, this seems to place Fedora in a weird position -- between what most now consider to be the bleeding edge distro, Arch,. and what many consider to be the stable distro, Ubuntu. What niche does fedora intend to fullfill? -- Fedora 10 (www.pembo13.com) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
