Re: updates are all failling.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I updated two F11 systems.  One worked without errors the other failed with:

Error Downloading Packages:
  grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586: failure: grubby-6.0.87-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  12:dhcp-devel-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhcp-devel-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  12:dhcp-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhcp-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586: failure: farsight2-0.0.12-1.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  12:dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586: failure: dhclient-4.1.0-22.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  gnome-common-2.26.0-2.fc11.noarch: failure: gnome-common-2.26.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586: failure: alsa-plugins-pulseaudio-1.0.20-2.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586: failure: gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  gstreamer-plugins-good-devel-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586: failure: gstreamer-plugins-good-devel-0.10.15-3.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')
  gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586: failure: gdb-6.8.50.20090302-33.fc11.i586.rpm from updates: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')

So I assume the problem is that not all mirrors have the updated packages.  What's interesting though is that the system that failed never found the mirror which worked on the other system. I restarted the yum update and it failed again.

Paolo

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Kam Leo <kam.leo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Paolo Galtieri<pgaltieri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just wait a while and try again.  I did a yum update a few minutes ago and
> it failed on the first dozen mirrors and then found one.  So I would try
> again in a few minutes. It takes a while for everything to propagate to the
> mirrors.
>
> Paolo

Did some one jump the gun? I was under the impression that the
metadata was supposed to be updated after packages had sufficient time
to propagate to the mirrors.

--

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux