On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 12:05 -0400, David wrote: > On 7/10/2009 11:34 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote: > > On 07/10/09 18:47, quoth Mikkel L. Ellertson: > >> David, one way to solve the problem is to write a filter rule that > >> sends g's messages directly to trash. > > > > New entry in my access file > > From:geleem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx REJECT 553 PGP signing with no public key. > > > For some reason this has not made it to the list. I apologize if this > shows up twice. > > > I was trying to advise him that he should do the correct thing. I failed > at that. His GunPG signature is a waste of time, his time and my time, > since it can not be verified that it is even his signature. > > I did not want to /null/void his posts. With his 'nasty' reply he has > given me no other choice. His posts will now be deleted directly from > the email server before downloading. > > Sad thing about that is that if, in the future, he should decide to use > GnuPG properly I'll never know. > > BTW. You did notice that I made no comment on his excessively long and > rambling 'signature'. :-) > I am confused about the brouhaha over the signature that g sent. When I get his message in evolution there is just as single line saying he has signed his message. This bothers me not at all. I assume something more annoying happens with other mail programs.. What is it that happens that annoys people so much > -- ======================================================================= Old age is too high a price to pay for maturity. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
