Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 19:25:50 +0200,
Roberto Ragusa <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The system is on RAIDed disks, so I will disconnect one of them
as an easy rollback chance in case of unresolvable issues.
That's unlikely to work for you. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188314
A "bug" is a case where software does not work as intended, the behavior you
don't like is a "design decision" in that the software works exactly as
intended, but you you don't like it. This should have been a request for
enhancement all along.
Since there is a general use for more ability to create custom raid arrays, the
ability to use an existing array would be useful. I find it particularly vexing
that whoever wrote the raid code did not understand the difference between
raid-10 and raid-1+0 and insists that at least four drives are needed to support
raid-10, and the number must be even.
So put this in as an enhancement request to use existing arrays, see if that
goes anywhere.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
