On Thursday 09 July 2009, David wrote: >On 7/9/2009 9:58 AM, Bradley wrote: >> I just did a bigger search of issues with Firefox 3.5 on the Mozilla >> website and apparently the problem I've experienced is one of a number >> of problems with this release. There are numerous reports of users >> having to downgrade back to 3.0 due to varying compatibility and website >> issues. It would therefore be my recommendation that Fedora (as well as >> any other release) to officially not use 3.5 until these issues have >> been resolved. If 3.5 works fine with the sites you visit, they you >> have "dodged the bullet" successfully but do not be surprised if you >> suddenly go to a new site (for you) and find it doesn't work. Feel free >> to check it out yourself. > >No proof. No URLs. No examples. No replies to others with useful >information. Evasive answers. > >So what do you all think? Pure Fud. Or a troll? :-) > > >-- > > > David Almost reads like an M$ troll to me. After one initial go away, FF3.5, direct from the mozilla site has Just Worked(TM) here. Whats not to like about that? -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them. <https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp> When you're not looking at it, this fortune is written in FORTRAN. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
