Markku Kolkka wrote: > Steven Stern kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika perjantai, 26. > kesäkuuta 2009): >> Updating : 1:cpuspeed-1.5-9.fc11.i586 >> >> Why are some packages named like that? Is the "1:" >> meaningful? > > It's the epoch number, and it's the most significant part of the > package version number. I.e. a package with > epoch:version-release of 2:0.0.0-1 is considered newer than > 1:999.999.999-9. Epoch 0 isn't displayed, that's why only some > packages (with epoch >=1) show those numbers. What I wonder is why it's using that 1:cpuspeed-1.5-9.fc11.i586 format. cpuspeed-1:1.5-9.fc11.i586 would seem more logical to me. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines