On 7/6/2009 4:51 AM, Joshua C. wrote: > 2009/7/5 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 10:41 +0200, Joshua C. wrote: >>> 2009/7/5 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 02:44 +0200, Joshua C. wrote: >> [...]>> Any chances F9 and F10 to get this firefox. they're stuck with 3.0.11? >>>> I would think there's no chance of F9, as it's about to lose support. >>>> Don't know about F10. >>>> >>>> poc >> [...] >> >>> I know, but the versions for f11/f12 were compiled on June, 30. there >>> is time and I don't want to recompile it by myself, because the >>> package isn't that small. I hope this can be reconsidered. >> Have you tried simply running the binary from the Mozilla site? I've >> often done this. Not ideal because it isn't within the Fedora package >> system, but certainly doable. >> >> poc >> >> -- >> fedora-list mailing list >> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines >> > I tried it but there are some plugins that have dep-problems (libgpod > especially) libgpod is available for Fedora 9 & 10, as well as Fedora 11. In both x86 and x86_64 archs. -- David -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
