Re: Help: F11 anaconda doesn't see my hard drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Davidsen writes:

Sam Varshavchik wrote:
David Timms writes:

On 06/28/2009 11:10 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
4) Anaconda sees neither the softraid partitions, nor the actual
underlying /dev/sd? devices at all.
When you say softraid, you mean linux software raid, rather than bios raid or hardware raid ?

Yes. Linux softraid.

Maybe it is related to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F11_bugs#Kickstart_installations_cannot_reuse_existing_RAID_arrays

No. I am not doing a kickstart install.

And I succesfully updated two other machines with F10 installed on Linux softraid, to F11.

Something in Anaconda is failing to see the second and the third drive on a machine with the first drive being an IDE drive, and the 2nd and the 3rd drive being SCSI drives. It doesn't see the drives, but I can flip over to the ALT-F2 shell, and run mdadm --assemble --scan. mdadm ends up creating /dev/md125, /dev/md126, and /dev/md127 (!), rather than /dev/md[012], but I can mount them manually and see my existing F10 partitions.

This sounds as if either the raid or scsi modules are not being loaded. My guess would be the scsi modules, but if you haven't solved this yet, when you get

Of course they're getting loaded. As I said: I can run mdadm to assemble the RAID and mount them. If they weren't getting loaded, mdadm would do bupkis.

I'd be surprised if mdadm, on it's own:

* Surveyed the attached IDE and SCSI hardware

* Mapped them to the supporting kernel module(s)

* Loaded the kernel module(s)

I'd be surprised if mdadm has all that logic built-in. More than likely it just sweeps all the existing device nodes, looking for RAID partitions it can assemble together.

started, could you 'lsmod' and see if the scsi stuff is loaded before running mdadm? mdadm is smart, they might be loaded on demand.

Actually, I can run 'fdisk /dev/sdb' and 'fdisk /dev/sdc' before running mdadm, and read the partition table. Everything is loaded, kernel-wise.

Bug 508554 -- F11 anaconda is seeing the disks, but intentionally ignoring them, for some reason.


Attachment: pgpigMIFV8bhw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux