On Thursday 25 June 2009 16:05:18 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:36:24 +0100 > > Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:07:07 -0700 > > > > Kevin Bowling <kevinb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 2 out of 5 failures. F10->F11 is completely unusable for any kind > > > of "uncommon" setup, i.e. LDAP login, Linux RAID, Xen DomU. > > > Anything other than one IDE hard disk with default layout really. > > > > 2 out of 5 ? - I got 3 out of 4 fails including hitting error paths > > that clearly were not tested because the error printing code didn't > > work but spewed python traces - and yes its in bugzilla already. > > I have 0 out of 4 failures here. > > I note that the plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. ;) > > It would be much better to get bugs on the failures so we could know > what is failing and fix it. ;) (Thanks for filing that one Alan). > In principle, I agree, but the rule of thumb appears to be that if your install and subsequent updates are straightforward it stands a good chance of updating correctly. If you have a more complicated system from any standpoint you are probably better advised to take control of the situation yourself. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
