On 16.06.2009 15:13, Brian Millett wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 14:57 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 16.06.2009 14:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> On 06/16/2009 04:55 PM, Brian Millett wrote: >>>> trying to update the gstreamer packages, there seems to be one missing: >>>> >>>> Transaction Check Error: >>>> file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so from install of >>>> gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-1.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from >>>> package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586 >>>> file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstflv.so from install of >>>> gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-1.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from >>>> package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586 >>>> file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgsty4menc.so from install of >>>> gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-1.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from >>>> package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586 >>>> Did gstreamer-plugins-bad not get built? >>> New version is in the rpmfusion free testing repo >> Just a detail, but the new gstreamer-plugins-bad packages were in the >> stable updates repos of RPM Fusion for round about five hours already >> when you wrote this (they should have been pushed there at in parallel >> with the new gstreamer-packages from Fedora, but weren't due to an >> stupid error on my side; sigh). > > No problem. All is well. Not really. People will run into those problems for 24 hours for all updates with tight interdeps (gstreamer sometimes, xine-lib-extras-freeworld, all kmod, and some other packages/kind of updates), even if RPM Fusion works perfectly and pushes all updates at exactly the same times as the associated package counterpart in Fedora. We need a fix for that, as it's quite bad for Fedora's fame afics. CU knurd -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
