Re: ti_usb_3410_5052: probe of 3-2:1.0 failed with error -5 ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi
I have a  Huawei device that I have been using on fc 8 and fc 10. But
now with fc 11 it does not work.

Here is the log file entries for the device.
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: USB disconnect, address 26
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: new full speed USB device
using uhci_hcd and address 27
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: New USB device found,
idVendor=0451, idProduct=3410
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: New USB device strings:
Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: Product: TUSB3410 Boot Device
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: Manufacturer: Texas Instruments
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: SerialNumber: TUSB3410
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: configuration #1 chosen
from 2 choices
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: ti_usb_3410_5052 3-2:1.0: TI USB
3410 1 port adapter converter detected
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: ti_usb_3410_5052: probe of 3-2:1.0
failed with error -5<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: ti_usb_3410_5052 3-2:2.0: TI USB
3410 1 port adapter converter detected
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: TI USB 3410 1 port adapter
converter now attached to ttyUSB0
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost NetworkManager:<info>   (ttyUSB0): ignoring
due to lack of mobile broadband capabilties

I have resolved this before by doing the following

create /etc/udev/rules.d/026_ti_usb_3410.rules

#TI USB 3410
SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device" ACTION=="add"
SYSFS{idVendor}=="0451",SYSFS{idProduct}=="3410" \
SYSFS{bNumConfigurations}=="2" \
SYSFS{bConfigurationValue}=="1" \
RUN+="/bin/sh -c 'echo 2>  /sys%p/device/bConfigurationValue'"

I have coppied /lib/firmware/ti_3410.fw to /lib/firmware/ti_3410.bin
this fixed it on fc 10

I have coppied /lib/udev/rules.d/77-nm-probe-modem-capabilities.rules
to  /etc/udev/rules.d/

Now I'm out of ideas please could someone advise ?

Thanks

your udev rule is different then whao worked for me, I did not need to specify idVendor and idProduct details

SUBSYSTEM=="usb" , ACTION=="add" , \
ATTR{product}=="MSP−FET430UIF JTAG Tool" , \
ATTR{bNumConfigurations}=="2" , ATTR{ bConfigurationValue}="2"


Depending on your kernel Rob stated Fedora 11 should have an already patched kernel, see blog http://xgoat.com/wp/2009/03/29/fet430-firmware-already-fixed/ My paper http://www.toshaan.be/publications/cybernetics/Programming_report.pdf , states everything, currently don't have the JTAG here, so I cannot test it myself anymore


--
Toshaan <toshlinux@xxxxxxxxx> - http://www.toshaan.be

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux