On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:45:03 +0200, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I also hope we'll see LZMA payloads soon. Gzip is really bad. Other > distributions have at least been using bzip2, which compresses > significantly better, but Fedora refused it for CPU consumption reasons. > LZMA is faster than bzip2, at least for decompression, and usually > compresses better. (It compresses a lot better than gzip in any case.) And not just for rpms. I am hoping that mksquashfs is able to use lzma before f12 is released as that will shrink the live images quite a bit. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
