On 6/9/2009 1:01 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, David wrote: > >> On 6/9/2009 12:13 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, James Bridge wrote: >>> >>>> It seems F11 has arrived, but only in 32 bit versions. Anyone cast >>>> any light on this? >>> a depressing number of the mirrors *appear* to have F11 CD and DVD >>> images, but their timestamps read june 2, so obviously they're not >>> valid. and there's a lot of that out there. >> Did you not install the Fedora-11-Preview? Did you not keep it >> updated? If you did you already *have* Fedora 11. > > yessssss ... your point being? > >> If / when you update *today* you will have a current, up-to-date, >> Fedora 11. One that is *newer* than the ISOs because the updates >> will contain packages that did not make it into the ISOs. >> >> Unless you really need an ISO so you can hold in your hand a Fedora >> 11 disk, that is alread a littl 'out of date', you *don't* need the >> ISO. > > which will do me no good whatsoever for the *other* systems i would > like to install f11 on, but thanks for trying to be helpful. Of that I was not aware. Most sys-adms and many users, the ones that I know, tend to be a little more conservative when it comes to installing 'the latest and the greatest' on release day. Best of luck with that and have a good day. -- David -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
