On 05/31/2009 08:50 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Its a self signed certificate, apparently it is more paranoid about that than > it is about an expired certificate. But then since its a redhat certificate, > should it not be a properly signed certificate. Seems to me like it should > be. It is not a Red Hat site. I am not sure why you think it is. It is his private website as confirmed by both the certificate as well as the whois records. > IMO, if this is to be the default for fedora, then time should be allowed for > him to support those installs which are problematic. Yes, assuming you post to a place where he can see it. That would be either bugzilla or upstream mailing list. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
