On Saturday 30 May 2009 19:35:20 Timothy Murphy wrote: > Beartooth wrote: > >> In any case, I decided to try Fedora-10, and found that much more to my > >> liking. It actually worked better on my EeePC-4G, eg WiFi (to my > >> surprise) worked out of the box, while eeebuntu seemed to require > >> madwifi . > > > > I have the 701, one of the earliest smallest slowest, and have > > been trying one distro after another. I did not get the good result with > > F10 that others did -- some error of mine, no doubt, but I don't know > > what. > > My EeePC is also a 701. > As far as I can see, Fedora-10 runs exactly the same on this machine > as on my other laptops. > Is your objection to Fedora-10 itself? > (In which case you might like Eeebuntu.) > Or is there some problem with running Fedora-10 on this machine? > > If I had my time again I would probably use ext2 rather than ext3 > as I have seen some warnings against ext3 on SSDs. > I don't know if it is possible to downgrade an existing system? > Worth googling for. Since ext3 is ext2+journal it should be simple enough. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
