On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:21:28AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > You should file bug reports if that's the case. > > Well, in the git-daemon case, I'm now one of the maintainers. So I > can more easily fix the problem directly. ;) > > I think there are some valid reasons for packages to drop files into > /etc/xinet.d and not require xinetd, but whether each of the 14 or so > packages that currently do so should be doing so needs looking into. > I posted the repoquery results in case others who use the various > packages want to look closer and perhaps file bugs where appropriate. You're one of the maintainers for git packages? In that case, let me say a big public "thank you." :-) -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
