Tim: >> It doesn't engender much confidence in using some software >> if its website is dead, or hasn't been updated in five years. Francis Earl: > There are actually rules that don't permit such software to remain in > Fedora, so file bugs when you come across something that hasn't been > touched in such a long period. I agree there should be mechanisms > around, but filing bugs is just as useful - even if it's more time > consuming. Sometimes you want such software, as it's the only thing that does it's job, or is bug free and didn't need further work ;-), etc. But part of the build process red flagging such things could lead to user actions such as removing dross from the repos, editing the RPM info to remove dead links, etc. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
