On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:55 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:43:37 -0700 > Craig White wrote: > > > fwiw - I have found the AdobeReader plugin to Firefox far more hostile > > than the Flash plugin and the latest versions on i386 seem to be a bit > > better behaved. In the past, I have removed the plugin > > from /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins (nppdf.so) and found that a much better > > solution but you need to repeat that each time you install an > > AdobeReader update. > > I agree, and I do exactly the same thing here. > > Have you noticed dead-dog slow printing with acroread 9? acroread 8 prints in > a few seconds on a HP5100 printer; acroread 9 takes ten minutes or more to > print the same page. ---- I rarely go to dead tree format these days so no. If the test were with the exact same document and uninstall AR9 and re-install AR8 and verifiable, it would be interesting but too many other variables often sneak in otherwise. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
