On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 11:52:20PM +0200, Andras Simon wrote: > On 4/5/09, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Andras Simon wrote: > >> There may be reasons for not liking vi or emacs, but their being > >> useless is certainly not one of them. > > > > They're useless compared to editors which you can just start to use with no > > learning curve. > > Is this how you approach all tools, or only editors? > > Not to mention that using emacs as a simple text editor requires no > learning whatsoever. If you can use a menu, know what "open", "save", > "exit" and "help" means, "you can just start to use" it. Yes, there's > a lot to learn about emacs, but you don't have to write emacs > extensions from day one. > > I'm not a vi user, but I'm pretty sure this holds for at least the > X-ified versions of vi, too. > > Andras > I love that you don't need a mouse in emacs. > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- "Any fool can know. The point is to understand" --Albert Einstein -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
