On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 07:30 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > > > >> Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >>> On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 01:55 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>>> This snippet might be of interest: > >>>> grep lm /proc/cpuinfo >/dev/null && [ `uname -m` != x86_64 ] && echo 'Your > >>>> CPU is 64-bit-capable, you are running a 32-bit OS, why???' > >>>> > >>>> Kevin Kofler > >>> Kevin, > >>> > >>> That would be a good addition !!! However I have some 64-bit > >>> machines I wish had had the 32 bit os on because there are still a > >>> some things that I have not been able to work with adobe flash on > >>> 64 but work easily on 32. > >> Adobe has made a BETA version of their flash player available (last > >> September). It is not packaged in an RPM, but only consists of one > >> .so file that needs to be put in your /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins > >> dir. It works just fine (as compared to using the 32 bit plugin > >> with a 32_64 bit wrapper): > >> > >> libflashplayer-10.0.d21.1.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz > >> > > > > there appears to be a newer version than the above: > > > > http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ > > Actually, yes, there was a new release just made in February, see the > following page: > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html > > > rday > > Thanks for pointing that out. > > -- > Kevin J. Cummings Guys, Thanks for the information.... I'll try it out Greg -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
