On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:20:42 +0100 Adel ESSAFI <adelessafi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, > I see that many of you point me to centOs. The idea is interresting. > However, why centOs is not as known as ubuntu. The main advantage in ubunti > (in my point of view) is LTS and codecs! Why centOS is not a commercial > success? I wasn't that Ubuntu was either.. CentOS isn't trying to be a commercial success. It's trying to be a community distribution. To be a commercial success you need business support services, training and all the other stuff - at which point you are looking at things like Red Hat Enterprise Linux. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
