--- On Sat, 3/21/09, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: fedora LTS , why not? > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 1:54 PM > Adel ESSAFI wrote: > > For this example: I mean that some ubuntu multimedia > software ask you > > installing codecs when needed!! And they install the > appropriate one. This > > unfortunatly does not exist in Fedora > > Unfortunately, pointing you to codecs which are illegal in > the US is also > illegal in the US. Ubuntu gets away with it because > Canonical is based in > the Isle of Man, not in the US. > > Kevin Kofler > > -- I can understand the LTS support complaints, but CentOS, Scientific and others address this, but as far as the codecs part. There is a CD out there with everything prepackaged and Fedora based: http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-announce/2008-12/msg00007.html http://reddevil62-techhead.blogspot.com/2008/10/omega-10-live-cd-beta-fedora-with-added.html It is installable and has the packages(which are easily installed otherwise by the way) that the users in this thread are asking for. I wonder sometimes if people know about this, it seems that they don't know about it. I hope that the work of several people who have taken the time to work on such projects get the notice that they deserver :) Regards, Antonio -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
