Aldo Foot wrote: > > >> su -c 'chcon -t virt_image_t /path/to/some-os-image.iso' > ____ > > That's just how I do it. I've installed a WinXp VM in my F10 box. > KVM and QEMU work just fine. > I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more > manageable in the surface. > > I have been following this thread with some interest as I wanted to try out KVM to use for both alpha or beta Fedora images, and also to run an XP VM so that some applications that won't work outside of MS can still be used. However the box I wanted to try this on does not have the hardware virtualisation flags that are the first test in the documentation for running KVM. The question I am unclear about is whether KVM can still be used but give very slow performance, or does not having the "vmx" flag mean you can't use KVM at all? Does anyone have a pointer to a step by step guide for running a VM in F10? (not VirtualBox) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Virtual-Box-tp22626076p22634446.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
