On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:23 -0700 > Aldo Foot wrote: > >> I think VirtualBox may be preferred because it appears more >> manageable in the surface. > > A friend at work who uses it says it is vastly easier to > do things like pass USB devices through to the virtual hardware > with VirtualBox than with anything else he has tried, > so he can do things like use Windows scanner software for > scanners not supported by anything in linux. ___ I'll second that hands down. That's been my experience. If you use VirtualBox for too long, you may be tempted to ignore KVM altogether, which it's better from the kernel functionality viewpoint. At least that's my understanding. ~af -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
