On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 22:04 +0200, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote: >> 2009/3/16 Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>: >> > 2009/3/16 Joonas Sarajärvi <muepsj@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> 2009/3/16 Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Marc Wilson <msw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> Is there any reason TO do this? Other than that you don't like GDM? >> >>> >> >>> It's ugly. >> >> >> >> I think it's functional and beautiful, even though some other login >> >> managers have some options which GDM doesn't. >> >> >> >> I wouldn't want to use KDM if I happened to use Gnome. It would look >> >> out of place and add tons of completely unnecessary dependencies. >> > >> > >> > Seems like that rationale only holds water against non Gnome things. >> >> I'd guess there aren't currently KDE alternatives to most of the >> system-config-* tools, which are based on GTK+. KDE software is used >> where possible in the KDE spins. > > Most of these seem to be written in Python as far as I can see, i.e. any > dependancy on GTK is indirect. > > poc Please lookup PyGTK. It is a direct dependency on Gtk. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
