Re: dependencies/conflicts on regular Fedora 10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: dependencies/conflicts on regular Fedora 10
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 1:49 AM
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:34:15 -0800 (PST), Antonio wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Tried to update Fedora 10 x86_64, but 
> > 
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 from
> installed has depsolving problems
> >   --> Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64 from installed
> has depsolving problems
> >   --> Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package digikam-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libkipi.so.5()(64bit) is
> needed by package digikam-libs-0.10.0-0.6.beta5.fc10.x86_64
> (installed)
> > [root@localhost ~]# 
> > 
> > 
> > [root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/fedora-release 
> > Fedora release 10 (Cambridge)
> > [root@localhost ~]# uname -a
> > Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64
> #1 SMP Tue Nov 18 11:58:53 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
> GNU/Linux
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Antonio
> 
> After years of using Fedora, could you *please* analyse
> such problems a bit
> prior to posting a message that lacks the details?
> Do show your "yum repolist". Don't truncate
> the Yum output.
> Do query the repositories and verify that you see the
> latest pkg releases.
> Show what package releases are available.
> Do query your RPM database for duplicate packages. Clean
> them
> up with relevant tools (man package-cleanup).
> There has been an upgrade of libkipi and digikam on Feb
> 17th:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1421
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

This should not happen, and hence the post.  Updating again seems to cure it

Regards,

Antonio


      

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux