On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:58:46 -0800, Aldo wrote: > >> the last time I tried to install mplayer was a royal pain in the rear and I just >> gave up on it... dependencies missing... this package needed by that one... >> It was not worth the pain. > > Such a reply is completely not helpful. It's nothing else than FUD. > rpmfusion.org offers a repository, which includes mplayer. No need > to hunt for missing dependencies manually. Just use the standard > package management utilities that come with Fedora. And in case there > is a problem with the packages in the rpmfusion.org repository, > report a bug. FUD? why would I care whether someone uses mplayer or not? I'm merely expressing my opinion. maybe I should've mentioned I did this on CentOS. CentOS uses rpmforge to install mplayer. --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: mplayer = 1.0-0.101.20080903svn.el5.1 is needed by package mplayer-gui Error: Missing Dependency: libdvdread.so.4 is needed by package mplayer-gui Error: Missing Dependency: libdvdnavmini.so.4 is needed by package mplayer-gui but i have mplayer installed, just not the matching version required by the gui. $ rpm -qa | grep mplayer mplayer-fonts-1.1-3.0.rf.noarch mplayer-1.0-0.40.rc1try2.el5.rf.i386 ~af -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
